The Difference Is in the Employee Engagement Algorithm


You hear people throw around big data in HR and employee engagement algorithm as their secret sauce to describe how their platform improves your employee engagement metrics. But, one has to think if a lot of thought and effort went into said "algorithm". Assuming they really have one, when applied correctly, can they do the heavy lifting of taking complex data sets and calculations, analyzing them, identifying patterns and trends, and then creating optimal models that help us understand information in ways not previously considered. Do they indeed give "sight" to the word "insight"?. As HR professionals and internal marketers, we can use employee engagement software that has algorithms to help us achieve our stated objectives. But because there are so many software platforms out there, it's important to note that the quality of the output is not only dependent on the data you are collecting and putting through — but in how the software is helping you analyze the data - in other words, the difference is in the algorithm.

In the simplest of examples to illustrate this point, it's why we have many different kinds of search engines available to us. Back in 1998, when two Stanford PhD students were trying to create a scalable bot that would crawl the internet and rank pages based on relevancy, they indeed wrote an algorithm that would crunch that data from the results of a query and provide a rank of the most relevant web hits. They called this Page Rank. It was of course Google, and they could show very easily how their search results were different than that of Yahoo, AOL, Alta Vista or anyone else at the time playing in the space. The difference was indeed in the algorithm.

Let’s bring this into the context of mobile engagement now. Mobile engagement produces an immense amount of data byproduct. Typically we don't pay much attention to it. But we should. Because it can reveal a lot about what our employees think and really care about. We can learn about their behaviors, their work ethics, knowledge, advocacy intent, feelings and much more. It's not intrusive by any means, because the data that is being collected is being used to create a richer, more relevant environment for them to experience. And of course it's going to benefit both the company and the employee.

Typically, here is how we look at mobile employee engagement model:

  • First, come up with a set of initial segments based on usual grouping patterns in companies (divisions, sub-divisions, roles). Then we target content to these groups and try to engage.
  • Then, we look at the engagement metrics for these segments. Break these segments into more granular ones to see how the same data changes.
  • Re-create segments to group employees based on activity, performance (based on knowledge scores), satisfaction, engagement levels and advocacy. Re-target these segments to improve those specific metrics that are lacking.
  • Finally, use a robust mathematical model that can then give us a good idea of what we can expect for future (employee engagement, turnover etc.). A lot of times we think of these as forecasts.

Picking the right platform that automates the algorithm for your tasks at hand is the key. If the algorithm does not analyze data dynamically and instantly, you may not be able to act in time to address a specific situation in your company. As HR and internal marketing professionals, we tend to default classification, segmentation (cluster of similar types) and association (commonality in attributes) to what was being done forever - i.e. use regular static groups or divisions like marketing, sales, technology, engineering etc. Don’t pigeon hole yourself to these. For example, you may want to target all the millennials in the company or the baby boomers or those who are least engaged to give them relevant information and incentives for engagement. Then as they dynamically move to other segments based on their change in their metrics, they'll get re-targeted - thus improving your outcomes further.

Closed loop, integrated frameworks such as CoIL Engagement have nifty algorithms where you can easily adjust parameters to meet your insight needs. Contact us to learn more and see this in action.



 

Download the white paper, Your Ultimate Guide to Planning Your Employee Engagement App, to view the app platform planning process in four easy-to-understand sections.

 

Related posts

Understanding Intranets Versus Employee Apps
Building an Employee Brand—Thanks to Your App
Workforce Development: Everything You Need in the Palm of Your Hand

Want to explore how hubEngage can increase employee engagement fast?

SCHEDULE YOUR TOUR NOW

Recent Posts

 

Are Your Employees Lonely? Here’s Why That Matters

5 Things to Consider when Promoting from Within

Why You Should Segment Your Employee Surveys

Understanding Intranets Versus Employee Apps

Maximizing a Remote Workforce: A Matter of Logistics, Trust and Verification

Search

 

Connect with Like-minded HR Professionals

Access the latest employee engagement insights curated by a network of your peers. Download the HR Insider app today.

apple-app-store

google-play